As I'm sure most of you know, measure 50 didn't pass. This makes me happy for many reasons even though I am not a smoker. But I have to say, I am a bit surprised because Oregon voters have historically been easy to guilt into adding taxes.
Taxing smokers to pay for any sort of health care is essentially punishing people for what is perceived as a social vice these days. They may as well be saying that smokers are the cause of everyone's bad health, and thus are responsible for paying for the eventual medical bills. (Why not charge it to porn addicts, gamblers, or anyone who ever spent any time in jail? There are lots of vices to choose from.)
As one friend put it, smoking is the bogeyman. It is an easy target and as history has proved smokers will put up with added taxes. But smokers and tobacco aren't the problem. The problem is that there are a bunch of kids with no health insurance. (Here is what the Healthy Kids Plan was gonna do...)
Here is a very simplistic reverse causality. Why don't they have insurance? Parent's can't afford it? Why can't they afford it? It costs too much. Why does it cost too much? Frivolous lawsuits (?), people with inability to pay taking necessary or unnecessary trips to the ER, inflation... (Interesting info here.)
But that is all a rant. What is really bothersome is how in all of this, no one really knows how that money was going to change anything. Even the link I posted above wasn't specific. There were no dollar amounts mentioned---nothing. In fact, I am utterly SHOCKED at how vague that site is. It just looks like a nice (completely unthought-out) idea to me, and nothing more.
Wednesday, November 7, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
It's not thought out because the added tax "revenue" is earmarked to be tossed into the governments coffers. The "health Care For Tots" thing is a rationalization employed to push the tax increase through (what sort of monster would oppose health care for children? POOR children??)
2, 5, 10 years from now, the tax would still be in effect (and the gov would be flushing it down the toilet as it does now) but no one would really remember the justifications for it's creation. Like all other taxes we pay, it would just "be" without the potential for repeal or abolishment (even if it wasn't being used for health-care).
Post a Comment